PIMCO forecasts global growth of 1.75 percent in the year
through September 2013, weighed down by a euro-zone recession and a slowing
pace of expansion in China.
Repeatedly, they have been been warning that all of the political/fiscal hoopla
that has been going on has much more far-reaching consequences than what people
are expecting. With all of the fiscal theater that is going on, the US is
contributing to a larger pool of volatility and uncertainty—in such a fragile
state, it’s quite possible that not only will politicians spook investors, not
get much work done and ultimately do what amounts to twiddling their thumbs and
we slowly lumber toward a financial sinkhole (to the tune of $600B), but it
also (from a macro perspective) increases the probability that the US
could get downgraded. Granted, they
said this before we (as a country) knew who are new president is going to be,
but with the nosedive of stocks that occurred after Obama was elected, I think
it’s clear to say that the Republicans are not the only people in this country
that are reeling from election results (or, on the flip side, it shows us just
how integrally political parties are intertwined with our financial market
system).
So what? What does this mean? I don’t want to make this post
all about “How I Love Thee PIMCO, Let Me Count the Ways”, but it does ring true
that several of the publications that I’ve read from PIMCO signal to me (as a
personal investor) that we’re quick-approaching a cross-roads.
In Bill Gross’ investment outlook for November, he talks about
Flavor Flav, genies, Obama, Romney and Chris Berman from ESPN (yeah, he's that awesome). But he also hits
on a metric that I had never really thought of before when I thought about the
economy- the net national savings. I’ll be honest—I didn’t know what this was—(he
does a good job explaining it in his outlook) but it basically means “the
extent to which the US (corporations, government, households) are saving in
order to offset the depreciation that comes from our existing investments”.
(Un)surprisingly (?), it has been decreasing for a long time now—with a few
bumps but overall downward trending since the 1970s. This means that, overall,
we’re making less real return on our investments than what you would think. The
government has released a lot of funding to improve the economy, and although
this has elevated asset prices (yay! The stock market is improving!) it isn’t
actually improving our overall economic outlook.
Why is this important to me? Well, what if, hypothetically,
you were in business school and you knew that you had left a lucrative job in
order to define and pursue your dreams. If the economy is not setting itself up
for sustainable growth and improvement over time (for a while now, it’s just
that I haven’t caught it because I wasn’t an enlightened business school
student)—you’re a little worried. Across
the hallways at Booth, I’m already hearing the screams of students—even louder
than those of i-bankers the day that UBS announced their massive layouts. As
they rush past me, clutching their name badges and the tear sheets about all of
their “dream” and “safety” companies, their thoughts are clear on their faces--
Forget about the instability in the world economy! This is beginning to affect
me for real now—I might not get a job! I echo their fear. The nation is in a
highly perilous state. Politicking has done us no good, and now that we have
signed on for another four years of Obama, there are high hopes that this means
change. “FORWARD!” he had promised. We’ll have to wait and see. In the event
that I can’t find a job, maybe I can volunteer for the next election campaign—the
economy may go to hell but it seems like politics stop for no one.
No comments:
Post a Comment